Government decisions

Session: 15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing

Date: 2024-04-10 16:30

Total Speeches: 10

Membership: 15

Agenda Duration: 13m

AI Summaries: 10/10 Speeches (100.0%)

Analysis: Structured Analysis

Politicians Speaking Time

Politicians

Analysis

Summary

The session primarily focused on discussing tax policy issues, specifically raising the impact of abolishing the income tax 'hump' (or 'bracket creep') and the financial implications of the income tax reform. The discussion also highlighted how these changes might affect people with higher and lower incomes, as well as the funding of the state budget. The initial debate presented views on this reform, which could potentially bring a significant sum into the state budget, and what the consequences of this surplus or resulting cuts would be across various sectors, including the funding for teachers and other public services.

The second major topic area covered the reform of the Tallinn hospital network and the planning of hospital development activities, including the use of European funds and the budgetary impact of financing state assets. They also discussed the rejection of the Tallinn Hospital project and the development plans for the hospital network, emphasizing the need for expert analyses and continued deliberation. Additionally, the topic of voting rights for individuals with Russian citizenship was raised, and integration processes and their limits were discussed within the context of the state’s fundamental democratic values. In summary, a picture of the session's overall direction was established, and it was stressed that the discussion will continue, with decisions likely to take clearer shape in subsequent sessions.

Decisions Made 1
Collective Decision

No decisions were made; the session focused on discussions and understanding different viewpoints. The next step is further analysis and the making of decisions in accordance with the procedures of the Government and the Riigikogu.

Most Active Speaker
Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart
Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart

Eesti Keskerakonna fraktsioon

The most active speaker was Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart (pid="_982niXL9oQ"), who primarily acted as the leading participant in affiliation and discussion; positionally, she is in politics other than a clearly left- or right-wing camp, i.e., in a private party or a far-right role in the Riigikogu.

Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
16:30:20
AI Summary

He greets his colleagues, moves on to the next question, and this is addressed to the Honorable Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and is being put forward by the good colleague, Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart.

16:30:29
AI Summary

Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart criticizes the income tax reform, calling it the protection of tax breaks for the rich. She argues that the reform benefits higher-income individuals, necessitating subsequent cuts and tax increases that primarily affect lower-income earners, teachers, and pensioners, thereby increasing inequality. She also highlights that taxing banks and implementing a digital tax are not planned, and questions what difficult decisions still lie ahead.

Peaminister Kaja Kallas
16:32:32
AI Summary

Prime Minister Kaja Kallas stresses that eliminating the tax bracket bulge will put more money directly into people’s hands, thereby boosting consumption, lowering labor costs for businesses, increasing budget revenue, and establishing a favorable foundation for wage increases.

Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
16:35:21
AI Summary

Deputy Speaker Toomas Kivimägi asks Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart for a clarifying question.

16:35:23
AI Summary

The main point of the presentation is that tax hikes negate the benefits of the reform, and to plug the holes in the state budget, a new source of funding is being sought from the city of Tallinn. This includes the idea of merging Tallinn hospitals with PERH, despite the fact that the hospitals are well-managed and the experts' development plan does not arbitrarily support such a merger. The speaker simultaneously recalled the abandonment of European funding for the Tallinn Hospital project and hinted that the transfer of the Tallinn Zoo and City Theatre to the state could ultimately lead to the privatization of these assets—a move which, according to the speaker, is classic Reform Party policy.

Peaminister Kaja Kallas
16:37:30
AI Summary

Prime Minister Kaja Kallas stated that the approximately 400 million euro cost of Tallinn Hospital and the restrictions on the use of European funds by 2026 necessitated the project being shelved in order to protect other resources. She added that developments in the hospital network must be left for experts and the Minister of Health to decide and be discussed in the cabinet. Simultaneously, given the constraints of the state budget, both cost reduction and revenue increase must be taken into account, despite the opposition being critical, wanting to increase subsidies, and expert analyses not yet being available.

Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
16:40:42
AI Summary

Deputy Speaker Toomas Kivimägi asked Aleksandr Tšaplõgin to pose a follow-up question.

Aleksandr Tšaplõgin
Aleksandr Tšaplõgin
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmed
16:40:44
AI Summary

He returns to the issue of Russian citizens and asks whether stripping them of their voting rights would increase their loyalty to the Estonian state.

Peaminister Kaja Kallas
16:41:00
AI Summary

Prime Minister Kallas stated that integration studies do not show a direct link between citizenship and loyalty to the state. She noted that 93% of Estonian-speaking residents of Estonia and 83% of Russian-speaking residents of Estonia feel a strong national identity, and the proportion of people proficient in Estonian is growing. This is positive and indicates the necessity of continuing the transition to Estonian-language education. However, regarding the question of voting rights, there are two opposing views: Russian citizenship does not automatically mean being against Estonia, but the Riigikogu (Parliament) can hold discussions and decide what is reasonable and what risks one decision or the other might bring.

Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
16:43:28
AI Summary

Vice-Chairman Toomas Kivimägi thanks the honorable Prime Minister and concludes the discussion of this matter, stating that he will not make an exception for Anastasia, because Arvo Aller and Varro Vooglaid would otherwise be very angry.