Draft law on declaring the Motor Vehicle Tax Act invalid (592 SE) - first reading

Session: 15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting

Date: 2025-04-08 16:27

Total Speeches: 22

Membership: 15

Agenda Duration: 32m

AI Summaries: 22/22 Speeches (100.0%)

Analysis: Structured Analysis

Politicians Speaking Time

Politicians

Analysis

Summary

The first reading discussed draft law 592 (first reading), initiated by the EKRE fraction, to declare the motor vehicle tax law invalid. The presenter was Rene Kokk, and his speech contained strong criticism of the government's tax structure and the car tax, specifically the claim that the tax disproportionately burdens people with lower incomes and residents of rural areas, and that the law apparently does not correspond to the actual functioning of the economy and the interests of society. It was noted that the original ideology of the "environmental tax" has been changed, and the actual impact on people and entrepreneurs has been the opposite of what was expected – a rise in the age of cars and an increased burden on older people and large families has resulted from this.

The second paragraph highlighted numerous examples and legislative and budgetary problems: allegedly, there is a lack of financial clarity and transparency in the state, and the ways in which funds are allocated and used have been criticized, leading to a risk of a grey zone and the emergence of schemes. The discussion reflected widespread discontent with financial policy, including claims that money remains unused or moves around inefficiently, and that the direct objectives of the environmental tax do not align with the actual social and economic interests. Ultimately, the impression was that the session and discussion focused on the criticism of the bill’s effects and legal certainty, and in several passages, the need to declare the tax invalid and to halt proceedings related to it was emphasized, including questions regarding the refund of already paid sums.

Decisions Made 1
Collective Decision

No collective decision was made; the meeting ended without a final decision on the draft. Instead, the need to consider invalidation was emphasized, along with continued discussion and a possible reconsideration regarding tax rates and legal corrections.

Most Active Speaker
Rene Kokk
Rene Kokk

Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioon

The most active speaker was eoQySqbpowY, with ceremony; this likely represents a right-wing (EKRE) position. The speaker contributed to the discussion with strong criticism and core arguments regarding tax policy, social impacts, and the state's finances, and they also represented an anti-tax approach and the right to make appropriate corrections.

Aseesimees Arvo Aller
16:27:50
AI Summary

Next, the first reading of the draft bill No. 592, initiated by the EKRE faction to declare the motor vehicle tax invalid, will be discussed; the rapporteur is Riigikogu member Rene Koka.

Rene Kokk
Rene Kokk
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioon
16:28:26
AI Summary

Rene Kokk said that the motor vehicle tax is absurd and unfair and should be acknowledged and declared invalid, because it burdens especially low-income people and families and enterprises living in the countryside, and it diminishes the Estonian economy.

Aseesimees Arvo Aller
16:48:17
AI Summary

The vice-chairman says that there are a few more questions, and asks Martin Helme to answer.

Martin Helme
Martin Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioon
16:48:19
AI Summary

Martin Helme said that although the right-wing coalition was supposed to lower taxes, the bill to lower taxes is in the works and the entire coalition is against it, while at the same time the opposition submitted six bills to the floor.

Rene Kokk
Rene Kokk
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioon
16:49:00
AI Summary

Rene Kokk claims that some MPs say one thing and do another, and fatigue or a lapse in attention may explain why words and deeds do not match, which he illustrates with the example of one draft bill.

Aseesimees Arvo Aller
16:50:20
AI Summary

The deputy chairman Arvo Aller asked Vadim Belobrovtsev to take the floor.

Vadim Belobrovtsev
Vadim Belobrovtsev
Profiling Eesti Keskerakonna fraktsioon
16:50:21
AI Summary

Vadim Belobrovtsev emphasizes that the car tax issue is a huge mess, and even the ombudsman has come to the same conclusion, and he poses two questions: whether to start dealing with the details or throw the draft bill in the trash, and whether taxpayers who have already paid should get their money back.

Rene Kokk
Rene Kokk
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioon
16:51:31
AI Summary

Rene Kokk said that car tax should not be tinkered with any further by nitpicking the details, but it should be declared invalid and the taxes paid since the beginning of the year should be refunded to everyone, because it is unfair and must never remain in force.

Aseesimees Arvo Aller
16:52:40
AI Summary

Vice-Chairman Arvo Aller asked Rain Epler to take the floor.

Rain Epler
Rain Epler
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmed
16:52:40
AI Summary

Rain Epler poses a critical question as to whether the Social Democrats lie deliberately or do not understand taxation and the governance of the state, referring to the introduction of gender quotas for the boards of listed companies, Reili Randi's alleged lie, the discussion of car tax, and Anti Allas's wish to redo this round, noting that a billion remained unused, hundreds of millions go to NGOs, and the Social Democrats wanted 2.6 billion for wind farms.

Rene Kokk
Rene Kokk
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioon
16:53:51
AI Summary

Rene Kokk said that residents of Võru and Valga counties should learn from today's discussion what the Social Democrats' stance on the car tax is, and he noted that their behavior evokes ambivalent feelings, because he is not sure whether the Social Democrats understand the issue or are playing games.

Aseesimees Arvo Aller
16:55:06
AI Summary

Vice-chairman Arvo Aller invites Mart Helmet to speak.

Mart Helme
Mart Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioon
16:55:07
AI Summary

Mart Helme emphasizes that tax increases affect people most directly through the car tax and the elevated VAT rates that apply in the summer, and as he travels around rural areas he asks whether others have the same impression.

Rene Kokk
Rene Kokk
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioon
16:55:44
AI Summary

Rene Kokk claims that the disappearance of 10 million dollars immediately brings Siim Kallas to mind, and on the car tax issue Mart Võrklaev is central as its chief ideologue and importer, whose name will remain in Estonian history, despite a possible government U-turn.

Aseesimees Arvo Aller
16:56:51
AI Summary

The vice-chairman Arvo Aller noted that Mart Helme had submitted a question about the procedures of the session.

Mart Helme
Mart Helme
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioon
16:56:54
AI Summary

Mart Helme notes that, although it is not exactly procedural, he understands that Rene Kokk essentially proposed submitting to the United States Federal Reserve a proposal that the ten-dollar bill would feature Siim Kallas's portrait and the one-dollar bill would feature Mart Võrklaeva's portrait.

Aseesimees Arvo Aller
16:57:14
AI Summary

Vice-chair Arvo Aller said that everyone has their own take on the proposal.

Kalle Grünthal
Kalle Grünthal
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmed
16:57:20
AI Summary

Kalle Grünthal said that the public is facing a problem and the tax notice is an administrative act that should be challenged in an administrative court; he wants to apply the principles of good lawmaking to halt the implementation of the car tax, and emphasizes that these principles were not followed in the drafting of the law and that all impacts must be analyzed.

Rene Kokk
Rene Kokk
Profiling Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioon
16:58:25
AI Summary

Rene Kokk emphasizes that rules and customs are not followed, and he calls on people to stand up for their rights and, if necessary, turn to the courts, because if the law contains a clear infringement, it should be challenged on one's own behalf.

Aseesimees Arvo Aller
16:59:40
AI Summary

Deputy Chairman Arvo Aller said that he would give the floor to Varro Vooglaiule, but the question lasts only one minute and a response is desired, therefore it will be continued tomorrow, and Rain Epler posed a question to the chair of the meeting.

Rain Epler
Rain Epler
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmed
16:59:56
AI Summary

Rain Epler posed a procedural question as to what happens if Varro starts asking at 13:59 and the session ends partway through: will he continue from where he left off next time, or what should be done?

Aseesimees Arvo Aller
17:00:09
AI Summary

The vice-chairman Arvo Aller thanks and informs that the session has ended.