First Reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (Bill 677 SE)
Session: The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
Date: 2025-10-06 20:40
Participating Politicians:
Total Speeches: 68
Membership: 15
Agenda Duration: 42m
AI Summaries: 68/68 Speeches (100.0%)
Analysis: Structured Analysis
Politicians Speaking Time
Politicians
Analysis
Summary
The agenda item was the first reading of Draft Act 677 SE, the bill initiated by the Finance Committee to amend the Motor Vehicle Tax Act. The rapporteur, Finance Committee Chair Annely Akkermann, explained that the impetus for initiating the bill was the Chancellor of Justice's proposal of February 26 to bring the Motor Vehicle Tax Act and the Traffic Act into compliance with the Constitution. The draft focuses on establishing grounds for shortening the taxation period in two cases: the deletion of a vehicle from the traffic register or its temporary deletion for the duration it is declared wanted due to theft. Akkermann emphasized that the bill's goal is to resolve the most direct constitutional infringement quickly and concisely, and it should enter into force retroactively starting from January 1, 2025, provided it is adopted before December 1, so that the Tax Board can make the necessary corrections with the second tax notice.
The opposition (Social Democrats, Centre Party, Isamaa) sharply criticized the coalition's approach, faulting the insufficient preparation of the law and the correction of errors using the method of "cutting the tail piece by piece" (i.e., a piecemeal approach). Anti Allas and Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart highlighted that the law still lacks a regional component, fair registration fees, and specific exemptions for disabled persons, which, in their assessment, leaves the law continually unconstitutional. Peeter Ernits repeatedly asked why the coalition only begins seeking reasonable solutions after the intervention of the Chancellor of Justice. Akkermann defended the committee's pace, citing the heavy workload, and explained that other issues, such as support for disabled persons (for which 14 million euros have already been allocated), require separate draft bills for resolution.
Decisions Made 2
Following the proposal of the leading committee, it was decided to conclude the first reading of Bill 677 SE.
The deadline for submitting amendments was set for October 20, 2024, at 5:15 PM.
Most Active Speaker
Annely Akkermann (u6d8gV6PMb4), the Chairwoman of the Finance Committee, was the most active speaker, presenting the substance of the draft bill and answering numerous questions. (Better)
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Deputy Speaker Toomas Kivimägi concluded the deliberation of the third agenda item and introduced the fourth, which was the first reading of Bill 677 SE, the draft Act amending the Motor Vehicle Tax Act, initiated by the Finance Committee, requesting Committee Chairman Annely Akkermann to the Riigikogu rostrum for the presentation.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Deputy Speaker Toomas Kivimägi announced that they would proceed to discuss the fourth item on the agenda—the first reading of Draft Act 677, initiated by the Finance Committee, concerning amendments to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act—and invited Annely Akkermann, Chairman of the Finance Committee, to the rostrum to give the presentation.
Annely Akkermann
Profiling Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Annely Akkermann gave an overview of the draft amendment to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act (No. 677), which was initiated by the Finance Committee at the proposal of the Chancellor of Justice in order to bring the law into compliance with the Constitution. The main substance of the draft is to create a basis for shortening the taxation period in cases where the vehicle is removed from the traffic register or is temporarily declared wanted due to theft, and the committee makes a consensus proposal to conclude the first reading.
Annely Akkermann
Profiling Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Annely Akkermann provides a thorough overview of the procedural progress regarding Draft Amendment No. 677 to the Motor Vehicle Tax Act. This draft was initiated by the Finance Committee following a proposal by the Chancellor of Justice to bring the law into compliance with the Constitution, thereby establishing a basis for shortening the taxation period when a vehicle is removed from the register or declared wanted due to theft. She stressed the necessity of quickly adopting the draft before December 1st so that the Tax Authority can implement the required corrections.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Deputy Chairman Toomas Kivimägi posed a rhetorical question to confirm the definitive nature of the situation at hand.
Annely Akkermann
Profiling Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Annely Akkermann stated briefly that her presentation or address regarding the draft bill under consideration was concluded and she had nothing further to add.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Deputy Speaker Toomas Kivimägi thanked the speaker and then gave the floor to Anti Allas to ask a question.
Anti Allas
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Anti Allas inquired of the rapporteur whether the committee addressed other necessary amendments in addition to the provisions found to be unconstitutional. He stressed that the car tax must be made fairer and more reasonable, particularly given the absence of a regional component, and simultaneously asked whether these shortcomings are acknowledged and if amendment proposals will be welcomed during subsequent readings.
Anti Allas
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Anti Allas criticizes the car tax bill, emphasizing that, in addition to constitutional conflicts, it urgently needs amendments to ensure fairness and sensibility, citing, for example, the absence of a regional component and the necessity of reviewing the registration fee, and questions whether the resolution of these shortcomings is expected during subsequent readings.
Annely Akkermann
Profiling Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Annely Akkermann explained that a large number of amendments have been received regarding the draft Motor Vehicle Tax Act (including from associations and the Chancellor of Justice), but it was currently decided to proceed only with the most essential matters, resolving the direct infringement of the constitution. This is because other topics ( such as the reimbursement of the registration fee in the event of insurance claims) require more time and will be drafted as a separate bill. The law will enter into force on January 1, 2025, and allows for the correction of the annual fee mistakenly set too high for destroyed or stolen vehicles.
Annely Akkermann
Profiling Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Annely Akkermann announced that although several proposals have been received for amending the motor vehicle tax law (including from associations and the Chancellor of Justice), it was decided to use the draft bill to resolve only the most direct constitutional infringement first, in order to move forward quickly. Other more complex issues (such as the reimbursement of registration fees and the correction of mistakenly higher annual fees for destroyed vehicles) were left for the preparation of a separate draft bill. The law will be applied retroactively starting from January 1, 2025.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Deputy Chairman Toomas Kivimägi noted the increase in the number of questions and subsequently gave the floor to Peeter Ernits.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Deputy Chairman Toomas Kivimägi, noting the number of questions that had arisen, gave the floor to Peeter Ernits next.
Peeter Ernits
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Peeter Ernits sharply criticizes the ruling coalition, arguing that they only start looking for sensible solutions and "come to their senses" after the President or the Chancellor of Justice has specifically highlighted the mistake for them.
Peeter Ernits
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Peeter Ernits expresses his indignation over why the coalition only starts seeking sensible solutions and finally comes to its senses after the President or the Chancellor of Justice has harshly pointed out their mistakes to them, delivering a reprimand in a manner akin to showing a puppy its place.
Annely Akkermann
Profiling Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Annely Akkermann emphasizes that the differing opinions and discussions among legal experts during the legislative process are not insignificant; rather, they reflect various schools of thought and constitute a crucial system of democratic oversight layers, which involves the Ministry of Finance, the legal experts of the Riigikogu (Parliament), the President's legal advisor, and, if necessary, the Chancellor of Justice or the Supreme Court.
Annely Akkermann
Profiling Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Annely Akkermann rejects the belittling of legal experts' discussions, explaining that lawmaking is a multi-layered process that passes through the scrutiny of the Ministry of Finance, the Riigikogu, the President's legal advisor, and, if necessary, the Chancellor of Justice. She emphasizes that these various layers of oversight are precisely what constitute an integral part of democracy.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Deputy Chairman Toomas Kivimägi gave the floor to Anti Allas as the next speaker.
Anti Allas
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Anti Allas believes that fixing the shortcomings is taking too long ("cutting the tail multiple times") and demands to know the timetable for returning to the necessary changes, should the Social Democrats' proposals fail to gain support in the Riigikogu due to the coalition's opposition.
Anti Allas
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Anti Allas emphasizes that clear shortcomings should be resolved quickly within the framework of bills already before the Riigikogu, rather than dragging out the process, and asks the coalition for a timetable for returning to these essential changes, should the Social Democrats' proposals fail to gain support due to opposition.
Annely Akkermann
Profiling Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Annely Akkermann confirmed that the Ministry of Finance is drafting a bill, which will be submitted to the Riigikogu as soon as it is finalized, with the aim of quickly and immediately resolving the issue of correcting the tax notices for individuals who are currently facing an unconstitutional situation.
Annely Akkermann
Profiling Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Annely Akkermann confirmed that the Ministry of Finance is working on a draft bill aimed at quickly resolving the potentially unconstitutional situation related to correcting tax notices, in order to avoid further delay for those needing assistance. It will be submitted to the Riigikogu as soon as it is ready.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Following a brief introduction, Deputy Chairman Toomas Kivimägi Priit Sibul was invited to the speaker’s stand to deliver his presentation.
Priit Sibul
Profiling Isamaa fraktsioonAI Summary
Priit Sibul asks the rapporteur directly whether he truly believes the processing pace of the draft bill currently stalled in the Finance Committee is fast and reasonable, especially given the early spring appeal from the Chancellor of Justice and the rapporteur’s prior commitment to move forward concisely.
Priit Sibul
Profiling Isamaa fraktsioonAI Summary
Priit Sibul questioned the speed and appropriateness of the bill's processing in the Finance Committee, asking the rapporteur whether the current pace of handling the matter—which was originally raised by the Chancellor of Justice in early spring—is truly fast enough and pertinent.
Annely Akkermann
Profiling Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Annely Akkermann confirmed that although the workload of the Finance Committee is enormous, encompassing a quarter of the Riigikogu's draft legislation, numerous extra sittings, and thousands of pages of material, they are proceeding at a perfectly appropriate pace, and the necessary legislative amendments will be enacted precisely on time so that they are already in effect by the December 15 tax payment deadline.
Annely Akkermann
Profiling Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Annely Akkermann from the Finance Committee emphasizes that despite the enormous workload, which includes a quarter of all Riigikogu bills and requires numerous additional sittings, they will manage to enact the bill under consideration exactly on time, before the December 15 payment deadline. This confirms that the committee is moving at a perfectly suitable pace.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Deputy Speaker Toomas Kivimägi gave the floor to Helmen Kütt, asking her to come to the podium.
Helmen Kütt
Profiling Sotsiaaldemokraatliku Erakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Helmen Kütt expresses surprise that the necessity, raised by the Chancellor of Justice back in February, to bring the law into compliance with the constitution was addressed in separate draft bills, instead of being handled concurrently with, for example, the motor vehicle tax bill. She also critically asks when the committee plans to discuss the issue of people with disabilities.
Helmen Kütt
Profiling Sotsiaaldemokraatliku Erakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Helmen Kütt voiced her astonishment regarding the tempo of legislation, pointing out that addressing the constitutional concerns raised by the Chancellor of Justice back in February is being delayed, even as the motor vehicle tax bill is being processed via an expedited procedure. She concludes by asking when the committee plans to discuss the issue of people with disabilities.
Annely Akkermann
Profiling Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Annely Akkermann confirmed that the involvement of stakeholders, regarding which there is also a letter from the Chamber of People with Disabilities, is definite, and the corresponding session will take place, although the date of its holding is still undecided.
Annely Akkermann
Profiling Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Annely Akkermann confirmed that the involvement of stakeholders, including the Chamber of People with Disabilities, in the proceedings of the draft bill has been ensured, and the corresponding hearing will definitely take place, although its exact date is currently still unknown.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Deputy Speaker Toomas Kivimägi addressed his colleague Peeter Ernits to clarify the number of times he had taken the floor, expressing doubt as to whether the number 3 displayed on the screen was correct, and suggesting that it should actually be 2 instead.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Deputy Speaker Toomas Kivimägi held a short procedural dialogue with his colleague Peeter Ernits, clarifying that although the system showed the number three next to his name, he had actually only asked one question, resulting in a discrepancy regarding the number of questions.
Peeter Ernits
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Peeter Ernits expressed doubt about the origin and validity of the specific number (three), offering the number seven as an alternative, citing it as a sign of his confusion.
Peeter Ernits
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Peeter Ernits briefly and uncertainly expressed confusion over the specific number, doubting whether it was three or seven.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Deputy Speaker Toomas Kivimägi noted the absence of two persons during the session and subsequently gave the floor to Peeter Ernits to ask a question.
Peeter Ernits
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Peeter Ernits sharply criticizes the legislative process, deeming the situation a time-consuming and nerve-wracking waste of resources where, despite significant public opposition, a law is adopted and is then subsequently "softened" using multiple separate draft bills. He emphasizes that matters should be thoroughly considered before they are finalized.
Peeter Ernits
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Peeter Ernits sharply criticizes the government's legislative process, questioning whether it is sensible to adopt laws that generate massive public opposition only to then start offering mitigating measures. He considers such a waste of resources, time, and nerves counterproductive, recommending thorough consideration before making the final cut.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Deputy Chairman Toomas Kivimägi concluded his speech with a brief and heartfelt thank you, expressing sincere gratitude to the audience.
Peeter Ernits
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Peeter Ernits briefly confirmed his agreement or understanding, and then expressed his gratitude.
Annely Akkermann
Profiling Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Annely Akkermann emphasizes that the continuous development and adaptation of legislation is the daily work of the Riigikogu, citing as an example the frequent amendments to the Income Tax Act and the Value-Added Tax Act, and explains that the community of people with disabilities was not excluded from the motor vehicle tax discussions, as the original tax exemption was replaced by an increase in social benefits amounting to 14 million euros.
Annely Akkermann
Profiling Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Annely Akkermann emphasized that the continuous development and adaptation of legislation is the daily work of the Riigikogu, citing frequent changes to tax laws as an example. She explained that although vehicles adapted for people with disabilities did not receive a direct exemption from the motor vehicle tax, this was compensated to the community by increasing social benefits by 14 million euros, which ensured that their interests were fully considered during the bill’s discussions.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Deputy Speaker Toomas Kivimägi raised a procedural point of order, drawing attention to a discrepancy in the number of questions posed by Peeter Ernits (the system indicated three, although the speaker estimated it was only the second). He requested that the error be verified against the official transcript before subsequently yielding the floor to Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Deputy Speaker Toomas Kivimägi pointed out a procedural error in the tallying of Peeter Ernits's questions, noting that the machine had erroneously displayed the number three. He then apologized for the possible mistake made by the Chair, and subsequently gave the floor to Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart.
Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart
Profiling Eesti Keskerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart is criticizing the proposed car tax bill, noting that although the president vetoed the previous version for placing disabled people in an unequal situation, the current solution will also remain in conflict with the constitution unless sufficient and uniform special provisions are guaranteed for disabled individuals, as forcing people who are under the state's special care to give up their vehicles is unacceptable.
Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart
Profiling Eesti Keskerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart emphasizes that the car tax remains unconstitutional because it fails to guarantee the necessary exceptions for people with disabilities. She refers to the president's previous veto and the Chancellor of Justice's position that the absence of special treatment forces individuals under the state's special care to give up their vehicles, which is contrary to the constitution.
Annely Akkermann
Profiling Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Annely Akkermann challenges the criticism regarding the motor vehicle tax, explaining that the Chancellor of Justice did not necessarily consider it unconstitutional, but rather recommended that the Riigikogu consider exceptions for large families and people with disabilities. She emphasized that the median tax is low and that approximately 14 million euros were allocated for supporting people with disabilities as part of implementing the tax, which demonstrates that social aspects have been taken into account.
Annely Akkermann
Profiling Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Annely Akkermann clarifies that the Chancellor of Justice did not necessarily deem the support system for people with disabilities unconstitutional upon the introduction of the motor vehicle tax. Instead, the Chancellor recommended in supplementary remarks that exceptions be considered for large families and people with disabilities, simultaneously confirming that the Riigikogu (Parliament) has indeed responded by directing approximately 14 million euros from the motor vehicle tax revenue toward benefits and compensation for people with disabilities.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Deputy Chairman Toomas Kivimägi gave the floor to Vladimir Arhipov, inviting him to deliver his presentation.
Vladimir Arhipov
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Vladimir Arhipov emphasized that the car tax is highly unpopular among Estonians, and he inquired whether the commission had addressed the coalition partner's unexpected proposal to abolish the tax.
Vladimir Arhipov
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Vladimir Arhipov points out that the motor vehicle tax is an extremely sensitive issue for the people of Estonia, and, regarding the coalition partner's sudden proposal to scrap the tax, he asks whether this matter was even discussed in the committee beforehand.
Annely Akkermann
Profiling Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Annely Akkermann announced that the issue or topic in question was not discussed in the Finance Committee.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Deputy Speaker Toomas Kivimägi thanked the rapporteur, concluded the Q&A session, opened the debate, and granted Anti Allas, the representative of the Social Democratic Party faction, the eight minutes of speaking time he had requested.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Deputy Speaker Toomas Kivimägi, having thanked the rapporteur and concluded the round of questions, opened the debate and granted Anti Allas, who had been invited to speak on behalf of the Social Democratic Party faction, an additional eight minutes upon his request.
Anti Allas
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Anti Allas criticizes the rationale behind the introduction of the car tax, noting that it is necessary to cover the cost of the Reform Party abolishing the tax hump—an unnecessary gift to high-earners at a time when the state is seriously underfunded in security, special social care, and road maintenance. The Social Democrats are prepared to consider a reasonable car tax to cover the state's essential expenditures, but they demand that the current bill be immediately rectified and made fair by adding a regional component, reducing the registration fee, focusing taxation on luxury vehicles, and offering relief to people with disabilities and pensioners.
Anti Allas
Profiling Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmedAI Summary
Anti Allas is criticizing the necessity of implementing the car tax, which was introduced to cover the costs of abolishing the ‘tax hump’ promised by the Reform Party. He views this as an unnecessary handout to high-earners. However, the Social Democrats (SDE) are prepared to consider a reasonable car tax given the state’s heavy debt load and underfunding in key areas (defense, roads, and special care services). The SDE faction is nevertheless strongly demanding that the tax be made equitable by including a regional component, significantly lowering the registration fee, and considering exemptions or relief for people with disabilities and pensioners, thereby preventing the disproportionate taxation of average families and those who are self-sufficient but require support.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Deputy Speaker Toomas Kivimägi. Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart, representing the Estonian Centre Party faction, thanked those present and requested an additional eight minutes for her presentation.
Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart
Profiling Eesti Keskerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart sharply criticizes the tax chaos and instability created by the government, labeling it a "tax circus" where taxes are spontaneously juggled. She particularly slams the car tax, deeming it an unconstitutional "package mess" and a form of quadruple taxation that is unfair to families with children and people with disabilities, whose specific needs were not considered. The speaker accuses the government of taking populist steps ahead of elections while simultaneously cutting previous family benefits. She promises that the Centre Party will continue to fight the car tax in court and will completely repeal it if they win the next elections and come to power.
Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart
Profiling Eesti Keskerakonna fraktsioonAI Summary
Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart criticized the government for implementing tax chaos and a constantly changing car tax, labeling it an unconstitutional "omnibus disaster" (or "cluster law") and a form of quadruple taxation that particularly harms families with children and people with disabilities. The Centre Party promises to continue the legal battle all the way to the Supreme Court and completely abolish the car tax if they come to power at the national level, while currently offering compensation in Tallinn to the elderly, people with special needs, and families.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Deputy Speaker Toomas Kivimägi offered his thanks and subsequently gave the floor to Aivar Kokk, the representative of the Isamaa faction.
Aivar Kokk
Profiling Isamaa fraktsioonAI Summary
Aivar Kokk sharply criticizes the government's claim of a lack of money, pointing to billions in unused, carried-over funds every year. He also blames the coalition for supporting the motor vehicle tax and for allowing people who don't understand economics to run the country, which has resulted in damaging tax hikes and a failed energy policy.
Aivar Kokk
Profiling Isamaa fraktsioonAI Summary
Aivar Kokk sharply criticizes the government's alleged cash shortage, highlighting 1.7 billion euros in unused budget funds, and points out that the motor vehicle tax was supported by the coalition parties, whose actual purpose is to cover tax benefits for high earners. Simultaneously, he blames the country's economic problems and the onset of the energy crisis on leaders lacking economic experience and on their poor decisions.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Deputy Speaker Toomas Kivimägi made a brief procedural note, requesting three additional minutes be added to the speaking time.
Aivar Kokk
Profiling Isamaa fraktsioonAI Summary
Aivar Kokk, representing the Isamaa Party, sharply criticizes the government’s motor vehicle tax, calling it a failure and demanding its immediate repeal, arguing that it disproportionately burdens both rural and urban residents for whom public transport is insufficient. To cover the cost of abolishing the tax, he proposes eliminating the income tax exemption for high earners, promising that Isamaa will repeal this tax by 2027 at the latest.
Aivar Kokk
Profiling Isamaa fraktsioonAI Summary
Aivar Kokk sharply criticizes political hypocrisy and urgently demands the immediate repeal of the motor vehicle tax, arguing that it has failed and makes life difficult for people. To offset the lost revenue, he proposes eliminating the income tax exemption for high earners. Furthermore, he asserts that the Isamaa Party's first action in office will be to abolish both the car tax and the increase in residential land tax initiated by the Social Democrats, in order to ease the burden on rural residents.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Deputy Speaker Toomas Kivimägi closed the debate, noting that Anti's delayed rebuttal would no longer be taken into account, concluded the first reading of Draft Bill 677 SE upon the proposal of the lead committee, set the deadline for submitting amendments as October 20th at 17:15, declared the proceedings on the fourth agenda item concluded, and finally commended the attentive audience in the gallery.
Aseesimees Toomas Kivimägi
AI Summary
Deputy Speaker Toomas Kivimägi closed the debate, noting that Anti Allas was late, and announced the conclusion of the first reading of Bill 677, based on the proposal of the lead committee, setting the deadline for submitting amendments as October 20th at 5:15 p.m., thereby concluding the proceedings on the fourth item on the agenda, and commending the audience for their dignified conduct.